AMD ATI Radeon HD 4770 512MB

Written by Tim Smalley

April 28, 2009 | 08:35

Tags: #40nm #4770 #512mb #card #comparison #evaluation #geforce #gpu #hd #performance #radeon #review #rv740 #value

Companies: #amd #ati #nvidia #test

Power Consumption (Idle and Gaming)

We tested the power consumption with a Watts Up? Pro power meter, using the device to record the total system power consumption at the wall socket, while we ran three sets of four runs of Crysis in DX10 at 1920x1200.

Using the data recorded by the meter we could determine the peak output, the consistent minimum and the average load over the entire run of tests.

As both ATI and Nvidia test benches are now identical Core i7 systems, we can accurately determine the apples to apples difference of what power both PCs take to run.

Power Consumption (idle)

Windows Vista Desktop (Aero Enabled)

  • ATI Radeon HD 4770 512MB
  • ATI Radeon HD 4830 512MB
  • ATI Radeon HD 4850 512MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 512MB
  • XFX GeForce 9600 GSO XXX Edition 384MB
  • Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 512MB
    • 170
    • 180
    • 192
    • 195
    • 197
    • 204
0
50
100
150
200
Power at socket (W)
  • Power Consumption (W)

Power Consumption (peak)

Crysis DX10 at 1,920 x 1,200 0xAA 16xAF, Peak Power Usage

  • ATI Radeon HD 4770 512MB
  • ATI Radeon HD 4830 512MB
  • XFX GeForce 9600 GSO XXX Edition 384MB
  • Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 512MB
  • Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 512MB
  • ATI Radeon HD 4850 512MB
    • 239
    • 246
    • 268
    • 275
    • 283
    • 288
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Power at socket (W)
  • Power Consumption (W)

RV740's process technology advantage comes into play again here as not only does the card sip power under load, but also at idle as well. It uses 10W and 22W less than the 4830 and 4850 respectively at idle, while it uses nearly 40W less than the 4850 at load, despite delivering very similar performance!
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04